Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A self-developing solid-phase immunoassay (B.R.A.H.M.S. PCT-Q, B.R.A.H.M.S.-Diagnostica GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) has recently become available for the semi-quantitative and rapid measurement of procalcitonin (PCT). In this study we examined the validity of this assay at daily clinical routine conditions at five different hospitals in a prospective study. After development of the assay (200 microl plasma, 30 minutes incubation), PCT levels were categorized into four groups (< 0.5 microg/l; > or = 0.5-< 2 microg/l; > or = 2-< 10 microg/l; > or = 10 microg/l) according to the provided reference scale. Samples from patients with suspected elevation of PCT of different etiology (n=237) were read by various analyzers and compared with the results of the Lumitest PCT (B.R.A.H.M.S.-Diagnostica GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany). A total of 74.7% of measurements were categorized according to the results of the LumitestPCT, 24.5% were read within the next lower or higher category. Using a +/- 10% range at the reference concentrations (20% at 0.5 microg/l), 82.7% of samples were correctly categorized and 16.4% within the next categories. Using a cut-off value of 2.0 microg/l, 92.0% (94.1% for +/- 10%) of the results were correctly categorized. The semi-quantitative solid phase immunoassay allows a rapid, simple and semi-quantitative measurement of plasma PCT. The validity of the test results and its ease of use are sufficient to support acute diagnostic decisions. However, for the follow-up of PCT concentrations and routine daily measurements, the quantitative luminometric assay should be preferred, when available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meisner et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: