Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structure–property relationships for the n = 2 member (Ba 3 Co 10 O 17 ) of the [BaCoO 3 ] n [BaCo 8 O 11 ] modular family have been studied by comparison to the n = 1 term (Ba 2 Co 9 O 14 ). It orders antiferromagnetically at T N = 62 K with spin ordering in the common [BaCo 8 O 11 ] units similar to that for n = 1. In the sandwiching perovskite [BaCoO 3 ] n blocks, the magnetic interactions are modified from n = 1 to 2 because of the large moment on the extra (Co3) cobalt atoms, while no local moment was detected on the perovskite modules for n = 1. For n = 2, it highlights the determinant role of Co3 in the magnetic paths and magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The transport and magnetic measurements on single crystals show a strong anomaly at ∼160–170 K. Below this temperature, the conductivity regime changes from a semiconducting behavior to a variable-range hopping conduction type. Possible symmetry losses have been investigated at 100 K. A trigonal-to-monoclinic distortion is proposed but remains highly hypothetical. For both n = 1 and 2, magnetic/crystallographic considerations together with density functional theory calculations allow one to assume an almost satisfied charge Co 2+ /Co 3+ ordered distribution between all of the cobalt positions (ideal Co 2.7+ mean valence). However, hole doping appears the most probable feature to satisfy the Co 2.8+ deduced from the oxygen stoichiometry assigned from neutron diffraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: