Key result
A standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a wristband or smartwatch demonstrated 97% and 99% accuracy, respectively, for detecting atrial fibrillation compared to 12-lead ECG.
Why the study?
Most photoplethysmography-driven smartwatches lack integrated atrial fibrillation algorithms, and adding a standalone algorithm could enable AF screening and burden assessment.
Does a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a smartwatch or wristband accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG in patients undergoing cardioversion?
Observational (n=151)
No
Does a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a smartwatch or wristband accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG in patients undergoing cardioversion?
The addition of a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm to consumer smartwatches and wristbands provides high diagnostic accuracy for detecting atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PPG-AF detection on consumer devices in cardioversion patients; leaves open prospective validation before broader use.
BACKGROUND Silent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) may be difficult to diagnose, and AF burden is hard to establish. In contrast to conventional diagnostic devices, photoplethysmography (PPG)–driven smartwatches or wristbands allow for long-term continuous heart rhythm assessment. However, most smartwatches lack an integrated PPG-AF algorithm. Adding a standalone PPG-AF algorithm to these wrist devices might open new possibilities for AF screening and burden assessment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a popular wristband and smartwatch, with regard to discriminating AF and sinus rhythm, in a group of patients with AF before and after cardioversion (CV). METHODS Consecutive consenting patients with AF admitted for CV in a large academic hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were asked to wear a Biostrap wristband or Fitbit Ionic smartwatch with Fibricheck algorithm add-on surrounding the procedure. A set of 1-min PPG measurements and 12-lead reference electrocardiograms was obtained before and after CV. Rhythm assessment by the PPG device-software combination was compared with the 12-lead electrocardiogram. RESULTS A total of 78 patients were included in the Biostrap-Fibricheck cohort (156 measurement sets) and 73 patients in the Fitbit-Fibricheck cohort (143 measurement sets). Of the measurement sets, 19/156 (12%) and 7/143 (5%), respectively, were not classifiable by the PPG algorithm due to bad quality. The diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy was 98%, 96%, 96%, 99%, 97%, and 97%, 100%, 100%, 97%, and 99%, respectively, at an AF prevalence of ~50%. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the addition of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm to a popular PPG smartwatch and wristband without integrated algorithm yields a high accuracy for the detection of AF, with an acceptable unclassifiable rate, in a semicontrolled environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selder et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=151). Standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm (Fibricheck) on Biostrap or Fitbit vs. 12-lead electrocardiogram was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for discriminating atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. A standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a wristband or smartwatch demonstrated 97% and 99% accuracy, respectively, for detecting atrial fibrillation compared to 12-lead ECG.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: