Key result
A standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a wristband or smartwatch yielded 97% and 99% accuracy, respectively, for detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG.
Why the study?
Silent paroxysmal AF is difficult to diagnose and most smartwatches lack integrated PPG-AF algorithms, prompting evaluation of a standalone algorithm added to popular wrist devices.
Does a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a smartwatch or wristband accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG in patients undergoing cardioversion?
Observational (n=151)
No
Does a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a smartwatch or wristband accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG in patients undergoing cardioversion?
Adding a standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm to popular smartwatches yields high diagnostic accuracy for detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG.
May support PPG-AF testing on wearables in controlled settings; leaves open broader screening use pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Silent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) may be difficult to diagnose, and AF burden is hard to establish. In contrast to conventional diagnostic devices, photoplethysmography (PPG)-driven smartwatches or wristbands allow for long-term continuous heart rhythm assessment. However, most smartwatches lack an integrated PPG-AF algorithm. Adding a standalone PPG-AF algorithm to these wrist devices might open new possibilities for AF screening and burden assessment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a popular wristband and smartwatch, with regard to discriminating AF and sinus rhythm, in a group of patients with AF before and after cardioversion (CV). METHODS: Consecutive consenting patients with AF admitted for CV in a large academic hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were asked to wear a Biostrap wristband or Fitbit Ionic smartwatch with Fibricheck algorithm add-on surrounding the procedure. A set of 1-min PPG measurements and 12-lead reference electrocardiograms was obtained before and after CV. Rhythm assessment by the PPG device-software combination was compared with the 12-lead electrocardiogram. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included in the Biostrap-Fibricheck cohort (156 measurement sets) and 73 patients in the Fitbit-Fibricheck cohort (143 measurement sets). Of the measurement sets, 19/156 (12%) and 7/143 (5%), respectively, were not classifiable by the PPG algorithm due to bad quality. The diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy was 98%, 96%, 96%, 99%, 97%, and 97%, 100%, 100%, 97%, and 99%, respectively, at an AF prevalence of ~50%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the addition of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm to a popular PPG smartwatch and wristband without integrated algorithm yields a high accuracy for the detection of AF, with an acceptable unclassifiable rate, in a semicontrolled environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selder et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=151). Standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm (Fibricheck) added to a wristband or smartwatch vs. 12-lead electrocardiogram was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for discriminating atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. A standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a wristband or smartwatch yielded 97% and 99% accuracy, respectively, for detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: