Key result
T wave filtering based on wavelet transformation improved the expert cardiologist's accuracy in distinguishing between AVNRT and AVRT compared to surface ECG (100% vs 75%; P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does a T wave filtering technique based on wavelet transformation improve the detection of hidden P waves in patients with narrow QRS tachycardias?
Observational (n=42)
Does a T wave filtering technique based on wavelet transformation improve the detection of hidden P waves in patients with narrow QRS tachycardias?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 75%
p-value: p=<0.01
T wave filtering based on wavelet transformation significantly improves the identification of hidden P waves and diagnostic accuracy in narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardias.
May aid narrow QRS SVT differentiation on ECG; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: A correct identification of the P wave is crucial for the diagnosis of narrow QRS tachycardias. This is sometimes difficult because atrial activity is hidden in the T wave. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of a T wave filtering technique based on wavelet transformation to identify atrial activity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients with narrow QRS tachycardias and regular atrial activity were studied. A surface electrocardiogram (ECG), intra-atrial recording, and the T wave filtering ECG were compared simultaneously to check the accuracy of the filtering system in detecting atrial activity. The sensitivity of the T wave filtering and P wave detection algorithm was 85.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 81.2-89.4%] and the specificity was 89.4% (95% CI: 87.1-91.4%), with a global accuracy of 88.5% (95% CI: 86.5-90.3%). The expert cardiologist's accuracy in distinguishing between atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia and atrioventricular reentry tachycardia was 75% in the surface ECG vs. 100% in the ECG with the T wave filtering process (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: T wave filtering based on wavelet transformation improves the capacity of the surface ECG to identify atrial activity in cases of regular narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldwasser et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Narrow QRS tachycardias (n=42). T wave filtering based on wavelet transformation vs. Surface ECG was evaluated on Expert cardiologist's accuracy in distinguishing between atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia and atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (p=<0.01). T wave filtering based on wavelet transformation improved the expert cardiologist's accuracy in distinguishing between AVNRT and AVRT compared to surface ECG (100% vs 75%; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: