Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Placement of immediate implant in mandibular molar area is considered a great challenge, due to the difficulty of implant bed preparation in the presence of interradicular bone septa. Therefore, this study introduces a simple technique for implant bed preparation. Objectives: This study aimed to compare clinically and radiographically the effect of performing two different surgical approaches for implant bed preparation. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on twenty six adult patients equally divided between a study group; where an immediate implant was installed following an innovative drilling protocol through drilling in the inter-radicular bone preceding molar extraction and a control group; where an immediate implant was installed conventionally after molar extraction. Clinical evaluation included assessing implant stability quotient (ISQ) at base line and after 6 months. While radiographic evaluation was done through periapical X-ray and CBCT to assess the implant position and marginal bone loss around the installed implants at baseline and after 6 months. Results: Clinical results revealed that there was no statistical significance difference in mean average ISQ between both groups at base line and after 6 months. Regarding the radiographic results the study group showed that the paralleling pin was more centrally oriented within the inter-radicular bone in comparison to control group. Concerning the marginal bone loss there was no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The implant bed preparation before roots extraction allows optimal positioning and angulation of the immediate implant in mandibular molar area, thus enabling ideal future prosthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shokry et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: