Key result
Walking with a carbon KAFO significantly reduced oxygen consumption, oxygen cost, and physiological cost index compared to walking without an orthosis (-16%, -35%, -33%; p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does walking with a carbon KAFO improve gait efficiency in polio survivors compared to an ordinary KAFO or no orthosis?
Does walking with a carbon KAFO improve gait efficiency in polio survivors compared to an ordinary KAFO or no orthosis?
p-value: p=<0.05
Walking with a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis significantly improves gait efficiency in polio survivors compared to an ordinary orthosis or no orthosis.
May support carbon KAFO use for gait efficiency in polio survivors; leaves open randomized confirmation versus ordinary orthoses.
OBJECTIVE: To examine, for polio survivors, whether walking with a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis (carbon KAFO) is more efficient than walking with an ordinary KAFO or without an orthosis. DESIGN: Consecutive sample. SETTING: Post-polio clinic, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven polio survivors who had a carbon KAFO prescribed at the post-polio clinic. INTERVENTIONS: A carbon KAFO was prescribed, fabricated and inspected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index. RESULTS: An ordinary KAFO weighed 1403 g (standard deviation(SD) 157 g), whereas a carbon KAFO weighed 992 g (SD 168 g). Subjects walking with a carbon KAFO showed a tendency to increase step length, and to increase speed significantly compared with walking without an orthosis and with an ordinary KAFO (paired t-test, p < 0.05). Oxygen consumption per body weight, oxygen cost (O2 consumption for 1-m walk divided by body weight) and physiological cost index ((heart rate at 3-min walk - heart rate at rest) /speed) were significantly lower than those walking without an orthosis (-16%, -35%, -33%; paired t-test, p < 0.05) and were lower than those walking with an ordinary KAFO (-9%, -14%, -15%; paired t-test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The gait efficiency of polio survivors with a carbon KAFO was objectively better than those without an orthosis or with an ordinary KAFO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hachisuka et al. (2007) studied Polio survivors (n=11). Carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis (carbon KAFO) vs. Walking without an orthosis or with an ordinary KAFO was evaluated on Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index (p=<0.05). Walking with a carbon KAFO significantly reduced oxygen consumption, oxygen cost, and physiological cost index compared to walking without an orthosis (-16%, -35%, -33%; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: