A comprehensive review of sodium-based flue gas desulphurisation is presented in this article. The paper provides a comparison of various sodium-based technologies with regards to sulphur removal efficiency, sorbent cost, by-product valorisation and overall process economics. More emphasis was placed on dry sorbent injection (furnace sorbent injection, economizer sorbent injection, duct sorbent injection) and semi-dry flue gas desulphurisation. Particular effort was devoted in identifying state-of-the-art technologies and potential research gaps in a summarized way. In water-scarce countries, where sodium-based technologies are more economically feasible, and duct sorbent injection processes are favourable, it is recommended to use sodium-based absorbents since they will have higher sorbent utilization and improved electrical resistivity (compared to their calcium-based and/or magnesium-based sorbent equivalents). However, the check-and-balance of the associated advantages and disadvantages are a pivotal determinant of the sorbent choice. Apart from sulphur dioxide abatement, the additional advantages of sodium-based absorbents include its high sulphur trioxide removal efficiency as well as its hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride removal capability. A scarcity in literature, especially as it relates to application in the South African coal-fired power generation industry, necessitates the need for further research with particular focus on local sodium-based absorbent markets, the physiochemical properties and sulphur dioxide reduction potential of locally acquired sodium-based absorbents, modelling of sulphation reaction kinetics in semi-dry and dry application, as well as the techno-economic feasibility of sorbent based technologies for the South African power industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mchabe et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: