Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The artification hypothesis offers a new direction for describing and understanding non-iconic Pleistocene rock art by conceptualizing it as the product or residue of a behavior of “artifying”, rather than as a specific form of graphic paleoart. “Why did our ancestors make marks on (artify) rock surfaces?” becomes the appropriate first question, rather than “Are these marks symbolic (and hence art)?” The term artification refers to what I propose is an undescribed but biologically distinctive...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellen Dissanayake (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: