Key result
Long-term survival after first permanent pacemaker implantation was worse than expected, with VVI pacing mode independently predicting increased mortality.
Why the study?
Does permanent pacemaker implantation affect long-term survival in patients requiring their first pacemaker compared to age- and gender-matched cohorts?
Cohort (n=803)
Does permanent pacemaker implantation affect long-term survival in patients requiring their first pacemaker compared to age- and gender-matched cohorts?
In patients receiving their first permanent pacemaker, long-term mortality is higher than in age- and gender-matched cohorts, driven largely by underlying heart disease and VVI pacing mode.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survival after first pacemaker exceeds matched expectations and associates with VVI mode; leaves open whether mode selection independently influences mortality.
AIMS: To determine long-term time-related survival and evaluate risk factors for increased mortality in patients following their first permanent pacemaker implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis of patient records from implant to follow-up. Patient-specific time-lines were constructed to date of last review or death. Observed survival was estimated by event-free analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Expected survival was derived from age- and gender-matched cohorts. Risk factors for mortality were sought using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards method and risk ratios estimated. Eight hundred and thirty-three patients underwent implantation of their first permanent pacemaker from April 1992 to January 1994, and were locally followed up. Survival data were available for 803 (96.4%) patients (median age, 77.3 years [5th to 95th centile range: 53.5 to 89 5 years]) and follow-up was complete in 94.8%. At implant. dual-chamber systems were implanted in 443 (55.1%). single-chamber ventricular systems in 321 (40.0%), and single-chamber-atrial systems in 39 (4.9%). Observed survival after implantation was significantly worse than expected (P<0.001). Independent predictors of increased mortality were: age at implant (risk ratio [RR] 1.06: 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.12). VVI pacing mode (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.34 to 1.93), cardiomyopathy (RR 5.86; 95% CI 4.86 to 6.86), male gender (RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.22 to 1 32) and valvular heart disease (RR 2.01: 95% CI 1.98 to 2.04). CONCLUSIONS: At the end of follow-up, mortality was much higher than expected. In this typical pacemaker population. age at implant and VVI pacing mode were independently associated with increased mortality with accompanying heart disease having the greatest individual impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Pyatt (2002) conducted a cohort in Permanent pacemaker implantation (n=803). VVI pacing mode vs. Other pacing modes was evaluated on Increased mortality (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.34-1.93). Long-term survival after first permanent pacemaker implantation was worse than expected, with VVI pacing mode independently predicting increased mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: