BACKGROUND: Optical navigation of needles < 1 mm diameter remains a challenging task. Bending of these tools is the limiting factor. OBJECTIVE: To use a conventional optical navigation system for interventional fine needle procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel custom-made device was constructed to guide the needle in the direction of the planned trajectory. Accuracy of this device was analyzed with two setups (A = ballistic gelatin; B = used pork meat). For both setups, a Plexiglas cube with integrated Plexiglas reference arrays was used. Metal targets of 1 mm diameter were placed in the center. Images were acquired using a 3D fluoroscope connected to a conventional optical navigation system. After trajectory planning, ten navigated injections were performed freehand and with the linear bearing device for each setup. A 3D scan was performed to measure the distance between contrast medium and metal target after each injection. RESULTS: Freehand navigation with a needle of 0.9 mm in diameter was not accurate with either setup (Setup A: mean 33.4 mm; range, 3-63 mm; Setup B: mean 40.1 mm; range, 12-75 mm). Linear bearing navigation was significant more precisely (Setup A: mean 0.7 mm; range, 0-0.75 mm; Setup B: mean 0.29 mm, range 0-1.3 mm) than freehand navigation. CONCLUSION: The linear bearing device reduced all bending. Optical fine needle navigation was accomplished with precision comparable to electromagnetic navigation. This device may provide useful for minimally-invasive clinical applications. Follow-up studies should compare electromagnetic and optical navigation systems in the same setup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stüber et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: