Key result
Fetal echocardiography for risk factors after a normal ultrasound increased severe congenital heart disease sensitivity by 3.1 percentage points (95% CI 2.3-4.0; P<0.0001 for noninferiority).
Why the study?
The benefit of fetal echocardiograms to detect severe congenital heart diseases in the setting of a normal second-trimester ultrasound was unclear.
Does fetal echocardiography for risk factors following a normal second-trimester ultrasound improve the detection of severe congenital heart disease in singleton pregnancies?
Cohort (n=688,247)
Yes
Does fetal echocardiography for risk factors following a normal second-trimester ultrasound improve the detection of severe congenital heart disease in singleton pregnancies?
Performing fetal echocardiography for isolated risk factors after a normal second-trimester ultrasound provides low incremental value for detecting severe congenital heart disease.
Low incremental yield after normal ultrasound cautions against routine referrals for isolated risk factors; leaves open prospective validation of targeted strategies.
Background: The benefit of fetal echocardiograms (FE) to detect severe congenital heart diseases (SCHD) in the setting of a normal second-trimester ultrasound is unclear. We aimed to assess whether the increase in SCHD detection rates when FE are performed for risk factors in the setting of a normal ultrasound was clinically significant to justify the resources needed. Methods: This is a multicenter, population-based, retrospective cohort study, including all singleton pregnancies and offspring in Quebec (Canada) between 2007 and 2015. Administrative health care data were linked with FE clinical data to gather information on prenatal diagnosis of CHD, indications for FE, outcomes of pregnancy and offspring, postnatal diagnosis of CHD, cardiac interventions, and causes of death. The difference between the sensitivity to detect SCHD with and without FE for risk factors was calculated using generalized estimating equations with a noninferiority margin of 5 percentage points. Results: A total of 688 247 singleton pregnancies were included, of which 30 263 had at least one FE. There were 1564 SCHD, including 1071 that were detected prenatally (68.5%). There were 12 210 FE performed for risk factors in the setting of a normal second-trimester ultrasound, which led to the detection of 49 additional cases of SCHD over 8 years. FE referrals for risk factors increased sensitivity by 3.1 percentage points (95% CI, 2.3–4.0; P <0.0001 for noninferiority). Conclusions: In the setting of a normal second-trimester ultrasound, adding a FE for risk factors offered low incremental value to the detection rate of SCHD in singleton pregnancies. The current ratio of clinical gains versus the FE resources needed to screen for SCHD in singleton pregnancies with isolated risk factors does not seem favorable. Further studies should evaluate whether these resources could be better allocated to increase SCHD sensitivity at the ultrasound level, and to help decrease heterogeneity between regions, institutions and operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a cohort in Severe congenital heart disease (n=688,247). Fetal echocardiography for risk factors vs. No fetal echocardiography for risk factors was evaluated on Difference in sensitivity to detect severe congenital heart disease (Increase of 3.1 percentage points, 95% CI 2.3-4.0, p=<0.0001 for noninferiority). Fetal echocardiography for risk factors after a normal ultrasound increased severe congenital heart disease sensitivity by 3.1 percentage points (95% CI 2.3-4.0; P<0.0001 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: