Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seventy-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma) and 56 with hemangioma were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 or 1.5 T to evaluate the efficacy of T2 values in differential diagnosis. T2 values were calculated with the two-point method. The mean T2 values of hepatoma and hemangioma were 58.9 msec +/- 8.9 and 101.6 msec +/- 25.8 at 0.35 T and 49.1 msec +/- 9.8 and 85.3 msec +/- 21.2 at 1.5 T. The difference in the T2 values for hepatoma and hemangioma was statistically significant (P less than .001) at both 0.35 and 1.5 T. Fifty-three of 56 lesions (94.6%) at 0.35 T and 86 of 102 lesions (84.3%) at 1.5 T were correctly classified when the T2 borderline between hepatoma and hemangioma was set at 80 msec. All misdiagnosed lesions were hemangioma, and all but one were smaller than 2 cm. However, over 90% of lesions smaller than 2 cm were correctly diagnosed when 70 msec at 0.35 T and 60 msec at 1.5 T were used as borderline T2 values. MR imaging with T2 measurement was very useful for differentiating between hepatoma and hemangioma (including small lesions) at 1.5 T as well as at 0.35 T.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohtomo et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: