Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 6, 2021Applied In Vitro ToxicologyOpen Access

Assessing Experimental Uncertainty in Defined Approaches: Borderline Ranges for In Chemico and In Vitro Skin Sensitization Methods Determined from Ring Trial Data

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SKSusanne N. KolleBASF (United States)MMMiriam MatheaBASF (United States)ANAndreas NatschGivaudan (Switzerland)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kolle et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a94845bcc4384ea2cc53180https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2021.0003
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The kinetic Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial2020 · 28 citations
  2. 2Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods2014 · 391 citations
  3. 3The impact of precision uncertainty on predictive accuracy metrics of non-animal testing methods2019 · 15 citations
  4. 4Accounting for data variability, a key factor in in vivo/in vitro relationships: application to the skin sensitization potency (in vivo LLNA versus in vitro DPRA) example2016 · 22 citations