Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly affects both psychological and physiological well-being, with limited effective treatments available for nerve injury-induced ED. Stem cell therapy, particularly using human amniotic fluid stem cells (hAFSCs), shows promise due to the secretome (hAFSC-S), which is rich in growth factors and chemoattractants. This study investigated the paracrine effects of hAFSC-S on erectile function recovery in a rat model of bilateral cavernous nerve crush (BCNC) injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty rats were divided into the sham and BCNC groups. The BCNC group received 200 µL of hAFSC-S via intracavernous injection. Western blotting was used to evaluate endothelial markers, while both Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to characterize the secretome. Four weeks post-treatment, intracavernous pressure (ICP) was measured to assess erectile function. Histological analysis, immunofluorescence staining, and electron microscopy were conducted to examine penile tissue and nerve integrity. RESULTS: The hAFSC-S-treated group demonstrated significantly higher ICP (91.77 ± 5.21 cmH 2 O) compared to the untreated BCNC group (66.60 ± 3.64 cmH 2 O). Histology revealed improved muscle integrity in the corpus cavernosum, increased smooth muscle content, and enhanced nerve myelination. Immunofluorescence staining showed elevated expression of neuronal markers, including nNOS and β-III-tubulin, in the major pelvic ganglion (0.42 ± 0.01%) and dorsal penile nerve (0.46 ± 0.01%). No significant differences were observed in vWF expression between the BCNC and BCNC + secretome groups in some regions (0.07 ± 0.009%). However, Western blot analysis revealed restored expression of endothelial markers CD31 and eNOS in penile tissue. CONCLUSION: hAFSC-S therapy enhanced nerve regeneration and penile tissue restoration, leading to improved erectile function in a BCNC rat model. These findings highlight its potential as a therapeutic option for ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: