Key result
A fixed-dose combination of 5/160/20 mg amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin demonstrated bioequivalence to separate formulations, with 90% CIs for Cmax and AUCt within acceptance limits.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of a fixed-dose combination formulation of amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin with co-administered separate formulations.
Does a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin demonstrate bioequivalence to separate formulations?
RCT (n=42)
Open-label
3-sequence, 3-period replicate crossover
Does a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin demonstrate bioequivalence to separate formulations?
A fixed-dose combination of amlodipine, valsartan, and atorvastatin is bioequivalent to taking the medications as separate tablets, with a similar safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables single-pill regimens to improve adherence; confirms bioequivalence of the amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin FDC to separate tablets.
The objective of study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of a fixed‐dose combination (FDC) formulation of 5/160/20 mg amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin with those of separate formulations of a 5/160‐mg amlodipine/valsartan tablet and a 20‐mg atorvastatin tablet. This was a randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, 3‐sequence, 3‐period replicate crossover study with 42 subjects. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected up to 72 hours postdose. For establishing bioequivalence (BE) for amlodipine, valsartan, and atorvastatin, a reference‐scaled average BE approach was used if applicable, as well as the conventional limit of 0.80‐1.25. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve to the last measurable concentration (AUCt) between the FDC and separate formulations were within the 0.80‐1.25 limit for all analytes but atorvastatin. The estimated within‐subject standard deviation of the log‐transformed values of the separate formulations, the reference intervention, was 0.3804 for the Cmax of atorvastatin, being set at 0.7489‐1.3352 for the BE acceptance limit. For both the Cmax and AUCt for atorvastatin, the GMRs lay within 0.80‐1.25, and the 90%CIs for the GMRs were within the BE acceptance limit. This 3‐period replicate crossover study demonstrated the BE of the FDC formulation of amlodipine, valsartan, and atorvastatin and the separate formulations of an amlodipine/valsartan tablet and an atorvastatin tablet. A similar incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was observed in both interventions, and headache was the most common TEAE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) reported an RCT. Fixed-dose combination of amlodipine, valsartan, and atorvastatin vs. Separate formulations of a 5/160-mg amlodipine/valsartan tablet and a 20-mg atorvastatin tablet was evaluated on Bioequivalence (Cmax and AUCt). A fixed-dose combination of 5/160/20 mg amlodipine/valsartan/atorvastatin demonstrated bioequivalence to separate formulations, with 90% CIs for Cmax and AUCt within acceptance limits.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: