Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several strategies to synthesize desired 1,2,4‐triazolo[1,5‐a]pyridine‐2‐carboxylate targets have been reported over the years. The most convenient way features the preparation of the precursor triazolopyridine‐N‐oxide through a condensation step between sulfilimines and a nitrile oxide species, followed by a deoxygenation step. This paper presents a detailed work on the synthesis of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐a]pyridine‐2‐carboxylate‐N‐oxide, featuring a synergistic experimental‐theoretical approach. Herein, we report the development of an efficient and straightforward method to prepare ethyl [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐a]pyridine‐2‐carboxylate 3‐oxide in continuous flow. The transfer from batch to flow processing resulted in a significant boost in isolated yield (53 % vs. 31 %) and a decrease in the simultaneous presence of starting materials and product in the reaction media from 4 hours to 3.5 minutes. An in‐depth mechanistic study of the reaction using density functional theory provided a deeper understanding of the whole reaction manifold and key indications on how to further improve the process in flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raymond et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: