This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Analysis of human brain responses from various neuroimaging techniques (EEG, S‐EEG, ECoG, or MEG) to visual stimuli in both the time‐ and the time‐frequency domain have provided means for researchers to understand the early stages of visual perception in humans. In the time‐domain, event‐related potentials (ERPs) have been used as neurocognitive tools to study a wide range of cognitive processing in humans, e.g. attention, vigilance, arousal, since the 1960’s (e.g. Haider et al. 1964; Spong et al. 1965; Eason et al. 1969). Importantly, the early neurophysiological studies also drew attention to the importance of carefully characterizing the visual stimulus – to account for non‐linear behavior of ERPs especially Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials (van der Tweel & Lunel, 1965; van der Tweel & Spekreijse, 1969).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: