Peer-review and audit studies are crucial for maintaining the quality of pre-operative assessments and ensuring protocol compliance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports peer-review and audits for preoperative quality assurance; leaves open need for prospective outcome studies.
Pre-operative assessment of patients for surgery is one of the most prevalent topics for quality assurance by peer-review in Dutch hospitals. This article describes the experiences with pre-operative assessment in nine hospitals. It is discussed why preoperative assessment is performed, what tests are performed (chest X-ray, ECG, laboratory tests), and how the pre-operative assessment procedure is organized. Hospital protocols are compared with literature findings and audit studies from two hospitals show the actual compliance to the protocols. It is concluded that peer-review committees and audit studies play a major part in the assurance of the quality of preoperative assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klazinga et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: