Key result
The extreme gradient boosting machine learning algorithm improved the prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes (AUROC 0.745) compared to logistic regression (AUROC 0.669) in patients with pacemakers.
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the utility of machine learning algorithms in predicting clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with implanted pacemakers compared to logistic regression.
Do machine learning-based models improve the prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices compared to logistic regression?
Observational (n=721)
Yes
Do machine learning-based models improve the prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices compared to logistic regression?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.745 (95% CI 0.631-0.847)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.745% vs 0.669%
Machine learning algorithms, particularly extreme gradient boosting, provide superior prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with pacemakers compared to conventional logistic regression.
May aid AHRE risk stratification in CIED patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
To assess the utility of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs), which can be recorded by a pacemaker. We aimed to develop ML-based models to predict clinically relevant AHREs based on the clinical parameters of patients with implanted pacemakers in comparison to logistic regression (LR). We included 721 patients without known atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter from a prospective multicenter (11 tertiary hospitals) registry comprising all geographical regions of Korea from September 2017 to July 2020. Predictive models of clinically relevant AHREs were developed using the random forest (RF) algorithm, support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm. Model prediction training was conducted by seven hospitals, and model performance was evaluated using data from four hospitals. During a median follow-up of 18 months, clinically relevant AHREs were noted in 104 patients (14.4%). The three ML-based models improved the discrimination of the AHREs (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: RF: 0.742, SVM: 0.675, and XGB: 0.745 vs. LR: 0.669). The XGB model had a greater resolution in the Brier score (RF: 0.008, SVM: 0.008, and XGB: 0.021 vs. LR: 0.013) than the other models. The use of the ML-based models in patient classification was associated with improved prediction of clinically relevant AHREs after pacemaker implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (pacemakers) without known atrial fibrillation (n=721). Machine learning algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine) vs. Logistic regression was evaluated on Prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes (> 6 min) (AUROC 0.745, 95% CI 0.631-0.847). The extreme gradient boosting machine learning algorithm improved the prediction of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes (AUROC 0.745) compared to logistic regression (AUROC 0.669) in patients with pacemakers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: