Key result
Patients with stroke or TIA had a higher 36-month atrial fibrillation detection rate using an implantable cardiac monitor compared to those with unexplained syncope (14.0% vs 7.4%).
Why the study?
Real-world AF diagnostic yield of ICMs in stroke or TIA compared to unexplained syncope was not well established.
Does the diagnostic yield of atrial fibrillation using an implantable cardiac monitor differ between patients with stroke/TIA and those with unexplained syncope?
Cohort (n=2,469)
Yes
Does the diagnostic yield of atrial fibrillation using an implantable cardiac monitor differ between patients with stroke/TIA and those with unexplained syncope?
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 7.4%
Real-world atrial fibrillation detection rates using implantable cardiac monitors after stroke or TIA are higher than in syncope patients, but significantly lower than rates reported in previous clinical trials.
Real-world ICM AF detection after stroke/TIA exceeds syncope but remains lower than trials; leaves open clinical impact on outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the real-world atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnostic yield of the implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and compare it to patients with an ICM for unexplained syncope. METHODS: We used patient data from device clinics across the United States of America with ICM remote monitoring via PaceMate™, implanted for stroke or TIA, and unexplained syncope. Patients with known AF or atrial flutter were excluded. The outcome was AF lasting ≥2 min, adjudicated by International Board of Heart Rhythm Examiners certified cardiac device specialists. RESULTS: We included a total of 2469 patients, 51.1% with stroke or TIA (mean age: 69.7 [SD: 12.2] years, 41.1% female) and 48.9% with syncope (mean age: 67.0 [SD: 17.1] years, 59.4% female). The cumulative AF detection rate in patients with stroke or TIA was 5.5%, 8.9%, and 14.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The median episode duration was 73 (interquartile range: 10-456) min, ranging from 2 min to 40.9 days, with 52.3%, 28.6%, and 4.4% of episodes lasting at least 1, 6, and 24 h, respectively. AF detection was increased by age (adjusted hazard ratio [for every 1-year increase]: 1.024, 95% confidence interval: 1.008-1.040; p = .003), but was not influenced by sex (p = .089). For comparison, the cumulative detection rate at 12, 24, and 36 months were, respectively, 2.4%, 5.2%, and 7.4% in patients with syncope. CONCLUSION: Patients with stroke or TIA have a higher rate of AF detection. However, this real-world study shows significantly lower AF detection rates than what has been previously reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noubiap et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Stroke, TIA, or unexplained syncope (n=2,469). Stroke or TIA vs. Unexplained syncope was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation lasting ≥2 min. Patients with stroke or TIA had a higher 36-month atrial fibrillation detection rate using an implantable cardiac monitor compared to those with unexplained syncope (14.0% vs 7.4%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: