Experimental study demonstrates microvascular ceramide signaling overcomes radiation resistance in colorectal cancer stem cells, suggesting a targeted strategy to enhance cure rates.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unknown whether cancer stem cells respond differentially to treatment compared with progeny, potentially providing therapeutic vulnerabilities. Our program pioneered use of ultra-high single dose radiotherapy, which cures diverse metastatic diseases at a higher rate (90-95%) than conventional fractionation (~65%). Single dose radiotherapy engages a distinct biology involving microvascular acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide signaling, which, via NADPH oxidase-2-dependent perfusion defects, initiates an adaptive tumor SUMO Stress Response that globally-inactivates homologous recombination repair of double stand breaks, conferring cure. Accumulating data show diverse stem cells display heightened-dependence on homologous recombination repair to repair resolve double stand breaks. METHODS: Here we use colorectal cancer patient-derived xenografts containing logarithmically-increased Lgr5+ stem cells to explore whether optimizing engagement of this acid sphingomyelinase dependent biology enhances stem cell dependent tumor cure. RESULTS: We show radioresistant colorectal cancer patient-derived xenograft CLR27-2 contains radioresistant microvasculature and stem cells, whereas radiosensitive colorectal cancer patient-derived xenograft CLR1-1 contains radiosensitive microvasculature and stem cells. Pharmacologic or gene therapy enhancement of single dose radiotherapy-induced acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide-mediated microvascular dysfunction dramatically sensitizes CLR27-2 homologous recombination repair inactivation, converting Lgr5+ cells from the most resistant to most sensitive patient-derived xenograft population, yielding tumor cure. CONCLUSION: We posit homologous recombination repair represents a vulnerability determining colorectal cancer stem cell fate, approachable therapeutically using single dose radiotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: