Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One hundred and eighteen patients with acute falciparum malaria were randomized into treatment with either intramuscular or oral sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar, Roche) and the results were compared with those from 68 patients treated in parallel with chloroquine. Parasitological cure rate was 97% with oral sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, 95% with the injection, and only 63% with chloroquine. The time for the disappearance of parasitaemia in sensitive cases was the same with oral and intramuscular sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and shorter than with chloroquine. Side effects occurred in only 3 of the patients treated with intramuscular sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine compared with 8 of those treated with the tablets and 13 of those treated with chloroquine. The results showed that intramuscular sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is as effective as, and probably better tolerated than, the oral drug. Increasing failure of response to chloroquine in Nigeria was also demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salako et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: