Key result
Emergency physician echocardiography estimates of ejection fraction in hypotensive patients correlated strongly with cardiologist reviews (Pearson's R = 0.86).
Why the study?
Can emergency physicians with focused training accurately assess left ventricular function using echocardiography in hypotensive emergency department patients compared to cardiologist review?
Observational (n=51)
Single-blind
No
Can emergency physicians with focused training accurately assess left ventricular function using echocardiography in hypotensive emergency department patients compared to cardiologist review?
Emergency physicians with focused training can accurately assess left ventricular function using echocardiography in hypotensive patients, demonstrating strong correlation with cardiologist interpretations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support EP echocardiography for EF assessment in hypotensive patients; leaves open whether it changes management or outcomes.
Objective: To determine whether emergency physicians (EPs) with goal‐directed training can use echocardiography to accurately assess left ventricular function (LVF) in hypotensive emergency department (ED) patients. Methods: Prospective, observational study at an urban teaching ED with >100,000 visits/year. Four EP investigators with prior ultrasound experience underwent focused echocardiography training. A convenience sample of 51 adult patients with symptomatic hypotension was enrolled. Exclusion criteria were a history of trauma, chest compressions, or electrocardiogram diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction. A five‐view transthoracic echocardiogram was recorded by an EP investigator who estimated ejection fraction (EF) and categorized LVF as normal, depressed, or severely depressed. A blinded cardiologist reviewed all 51 studies for EF, categorization of function, and quality of the study. Twenty randomly selected studies were reviewed by a second cardiologist to determine interobserver variability. Results: Comparison of EP vs. primary cardiologist estimate of EF yielded a Pearson's correlation coefficient R = 0.86. This compared favorably with interobserver correlation between cardiologists (R = 0.84). In categorization of LVF, the weighted agreement between EPs and the primary cardiologist was 84%, with a weighted kappa of 0.61 (p < 0.001). Echocardiographic quality was rated by the primary cardiologist as good in 33%, moderate in 43%, and poor in 22%. The EF was significantly lower in patients with a cardiac cause of hypotension vs. other patients (25 ± 10% vs. 48 ± 17%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Emergency physicians with focused training in echocardiography can accurately determine LVF in hypotensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Symptomatic hypotension (n=51). Emergency physician echocardiography vs. Cardiologist echocardiography review was evaluated on Estimation of ejection fraction (EF) and categorization of left ventricular function (Pearson's R 0.86, p=<0.001). Emergency physician echocardiography estimates of ejection fraction in hypotensive patients correlated strongly with cardiologist reviews (Pearson's R = 0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: