Why the study?
Does emergency Doppler echocardiography improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute left ventricular heart failure compared to Boston criteria and NT-proBNP in patients with acute dyspnea?
Does emergency Doppler echocardiography improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute left ventricular heart failure compared to Boston criteria and NT-proBNP in patients with acute dyspnea?
Emergency Doppler echocardiography, specifically pulsed Doppler analysis of mitral inflow, provides superior diagnostic accuracy for acute left ventricular heart failure compared to NT-proBNP and Boston criteria in patients presenting with acute dyspnea.
May support EDecho use for acute HF diagnosis in dyspnea; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis of acute left ventricular heart failure (aLVHF). However, a consultative exam is not routinely available in every emergency department (ED). The authors investigated the diagnostic performance of emergency Doppler echocardiography (EDecho) performed by emergency physicians (EPs) for the diagnosis of aLVHF in patients with acute dyspnea. METHODS: A convenience sample of acute dyspneic patients was evaluated. For each patient, the Boston criteria score for heart failure was calculated, and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and EDecho were contemporaneously performed. Four investigators, after a limited echocardiography course, performed EDechos and evaluated for a "restrictive" pattern on pulsed Doppler analysis of mitral inflow and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The final diagnosis, established after reviewing all patient clinical data except NT-proBNP and EDecho results, served as the criterion standard. RESULTS: Among 145 patients, 64 (44%) were diagnosed with aLVHF. The median time needed to perform EDecho was 4 minutes. Pulsed Doppler analysis was feasible in 125 patients (84%). The restrictive pattern was more sensitive (82%) and specific (90%) than reduced LV ejection fraction and more specific than the Boston criteria and NT-proBNP for the diagnosis of aLVHF. Considering noninterpretable values of the restrictive pattern and uncertain values ("gray areas") of Boston criteria (4 < Boston criteria score < 7) and of NT-proBNP (300 < NT-proBNP < 2,200 pg/mL) as false results, the accuracy of the restrictive pattern in the overall population was 75%, compared with accuracy of 49% for both NT-proBNP and Boston criteria. CONCLUSIONS: EDecho, particularly pulsed Doppler analysis of mitral inflow, is a rapid and accurate diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with acute dyspnea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazerian et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: