Key result
Growth hormone dose adjustments require individual changes in IGF-I exceeding approximately 35% to be significant, and levels should be kept within normal ranges to mitigate potential cancer risks.
Why the study?
Should potential risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer be considered when monitoring growth hormone treatment using IGF-I levels in patients with growth hormone deficiency?
Should potential risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer be considered when monitoring growth hormone treatment using IGF-I levels in patients with growth hormone deficiency?
IGF-I levels should be maintained within normal age-related ranges during growth hormone therapy to minimize the potential long-term risks of cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maintaining IGF-I within normal ranges may limit long-term cancer and CVD risks in GH-treated GHD patients; leaves open prospective confirmation.
Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I has proven to be important in the diagnosis of childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). However, the variability of IGF-I should be taken into account before it can be used in a clinical setting. GH replacement therapy in GHD patients increases IGF-I into the normal range, although there is a large variation. Excessively high (supranormal) GH-induced IGF-I levels are associated with increased prevalence of side effects in adults with GHD. Consequently, at most centres, GH doses are titrated according to IGF-I levels in GHD adults. Whether or not this should also be done in children has not been established. Due to the known variability of IGF-I, individual changes in IGF-I must exceed approximately 35% to be sufficiently significant to warrant a dose adjustment. Novel epidemiological studies have suggested that higher IGF-I levels are associated with an increased risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer compared with lower IGF-I levels in otherwise healthy subjects. Consequently, life-time exposure to IGF-I should be considered in all patients treated with GH, and IGF-I should preferably be kept within normal age-related ranges in children as well as in adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anders Juul (1999) conducted a review in Growth hormone deficiency. Growth hormone replacement therapy and IGF-I monitoring was evaluated. Growth hormone dose adjustments require individual changes in IGF-I exceeding approximately 35% to be significant, and levels should be kept within normal ranges to mitigate potential cancer risks.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: