Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate how anode-filter combinations influence image quality in and mean glandular dose to breasts of different thicknesses and compositions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms were obtained with a molybdenum (Mo) anode and a Mo filter at 26 kVp, a Mo anode and a rhodium (Rh) filter at 27 kVp, or a tungsten (W) anode and a Rh filter at 26 kVp in 965 women. One anode-filter-tube voltage combination was used in the right breast and another in the left. The mean glandular dose to each breast was calculated. RESULTS: Image contrast was highest in the Mo-Mo mammograms. However, depiction of the glandular tissue, pectoral muscle, and skin and subcutis was significantly (P < .001) better with the Mo-Rh and the W-Rh than with the Mo-Mo combination. The average mean absorbed doses to the glandular tissue for W-Rh and Mo-Rh were 50% and 75%, respectively, of that for Mo-Mo. CONCLUSION: Breast thickness is the most important parameter in selection of an anode-filter-tube voltage combination. Compared with Mo-Mo, both Mo-Rh and W-Rh gave good image quality of the mammary gland and a considerably lower absorbed dose. Mo-Rh-27 kVp is recommended for breast thicknesses of 60 mm or less; W-Rh-26 kVp, for breast thicknesses of greater than 60 mm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thilander‐Klang et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: