This canine model demonstrates a strong mathematical relationship between ventricular effective refractory period, basic cycle length, and VT intervals, which differs significantly between conscious and anesthetized states.
Anesthetic state alters canine ERP relations; leaves open translation to human VT modeling.
The functional relationship of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP) with basic cycle length (BCL) of stimulated ventricular depolarization and VT intervals of test-site unipolar ventricular electrograms were studied in five conscious and eight anesthetized (sodium pentobarbital, 30 mg/kg) open-chested dogs. The range of BCLs studied was 300 to 1000 ms, achieved through ventricular stimulation following chemically-induced complete AV block. In the conscious animal model developed for this study, two-to-four ventricular electrode leads were exteriorized and the ventricular rate was maintained by an implanted programmable VVI pacemaker. In all animals studied, the BCL-ERP relation was closely represented by the empirical equation ERP = A-B.Exp(-k.BCL), and the VT-ERP relation over the same range of BCLs was linear: ERP = C + D.VT. The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.991 to 0.999. The mean values of the parameters in the above equations determined by the appropriate non-linear or linear regression analysis showed significant differences between the two groups of animals studied. In three conscious animals a strong linear correlation between the test-site VT intervals and simultaneously measured QT intervals measured from the lead II surface electrogram was demonstrated (r = 0.993 to 0.998). For a fixed site of stimulation, the morphology of ventricular depolarization complexes as well as the corresponding T-waves remained essentially unaltered with BCL for both myocardial and surface electrograms. The possible applications of developed canine model and the results of the present study include: (1) the study of the rate-dependent effects of cardioactive drugs on ventricular electrophysiology and, (2) the improved design of electronic refractory periods of rate programmable pacemakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarma et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: