Key result
The molar volume change for ADP binding to smooth-muscle S1 is approximately twice that of skeletal-muscle S1 (120 vs 60 ml/mol), suggesting a significant difference in induced conformational changes.
A novel microvolume pressure-jump apparatus reveals that smooth-muscle myosin S1 undergoes a significantly larger molar volume change upon ADP binding compared to skeletal-muscle S1, which may relate to structural changes during force generation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distinguishes myosin isoform mechanics in animal models; leaves open relevance to human cardiac or vascular force generation.
Reactions involving proteins frequently involve large changes in volume, which allows the equilibrium position to be perturbed by changes in pressure. Rapid changes in pressure can thus be used to initiate relaxation in pressure; however, this approach is seldom used, because it requires specialized equipment. We have built a microvolume (50 microl) pressure-jump apparatus, powered by a piezoelectric actuator, based on the original design of Clegg and Maxfield [(1976) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 1383-1393]. This equipment can apply pressure changes of +/-20 MPa (maximally) in time periods as short as 80 micros and follow the resulting change in fluorescence signals. The system is relatively simple to use with fast (approx. 1 min) exchange of samples. In the present study, we show that this system can perturb the binding of 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-ADP to myosin subfragment-1(S1) from skeletal and smooth muscles. The kinetic data are consistent with previous work, and in addition show that, although 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-ADP binds with a similar affinity to both proteins, the increase in molar volume for the skeletal-muscle S1 binding to ADP is half of that for the smooth-muscle protein. This high-volume change for smooth-muscle S1 may be related to the ability of ADP to induce a 23 degrees tilt in the tail of S1 bound to actin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearson et al. (2002) studied this question. Pressure-jump apparatus was evaluated on Molar volume change (DV°) for ADP binding to smooth-muscle S1 vs skeletal-muscle S1. The molar volume change for ADP binding to smooth-muscle S1 is approximately twice that of skeletal-muscle S1 (120 vs 60 ml/mol), suggesting a significant difference in induced conformational changes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: