Key result
The hypertension screening program in Tibet achieved a high coverage rate of 94.9%, but demonstrated low effectiveness with only 28.7% of diagnosed individuals having their blood pressure controlled.
Why the study?
The coverage and effectiveness of Tibet's free physical examination and hypertension screening program across different altitudes were unknown.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,636)
Yes
Despite high coverage of a free hypertension screening program in Tibet, blood pressure control rates remain low, highlighting a critical need for interventions focused on treatment adherence.
Suboptimal control despite high screening participation supports adherence-focused strategies; leaves open effectiveness in prospective studies.
Background: Tibet is an autonomous region in China located around an average altitude of 4,500 meters above sea level. Since 2012 the local government of Tibet has been providing free physical examinations, including screening for hypertension. However, the coverage and effectiveness of this free program have not uncovered. This study aims to assess the coverage and effectiveness of hypertension screening and management program in 3 altitude levels of Tibet, and also the determinants of the success of the screening program.Methods: A stratified cluster survey was conducted among 1,636 residents aged 18 years or over in three different altitude areas in Tibet. We adjusted for age and sex based on national census data and used weighted logistic regression models to find factors associated with hypertension screening.Results: The coverage of the hypertension screening program evaluated by participation rate in the previous screening was 94.9%, while 24.7% (95% CI: 22.1-27.3) of them were diagnosed with hypertension. Females and alcohol drinkers were more likely to be screened. Among those diagnosed with hypertension, 28.7% had it under control. High altitude areas had a high proportion of controlled hypertension. The overall rate of controlled hypertension in high, moderate and low altitude areas was 35.1% (95% CI: 24.8-45.3), 32.7% (95% CI: 22.2-43.2) and 23.7% (95% CI: 14.7-32.6), respectably. Younger aged persons were more likely to have better control of their hypertension.Conclusions: The coverage of hypertension screening in Tibet was high, especially in the low altitude areas. However, the effectiveness of hypertension control was low, indicating a need to implement the treatment adherence routines into the current screening interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=1,636). Hypertension screening program vs. Unscreened population was evaluated on Coverage of the hypertension screening program (95% CI 93.2-96.6). The hypertension screening program in Tibet achieved a high coverage rate of 94.9%, but demonstrated low effectiveness with only 28.7% of diagnosed individuals having their blood pressure controlled.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: