OBJECTIVE: To examine relationships among changes in self-efficacy and changes in other clinically relevant outcome measures. METHOD: Subjects (n = 44) were participants in a prospective, randomized stress-management study followed over 15 months. Outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, pain, health status, and disease activity. RESULTS: Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between changes in self-efficacy (particularly total self-efficacy) and changes in selected measures of depression, pain, health status, and disease activity. The observed associations were not due to changes in medication regimen or to nonadherence to the stress-management program. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is provided that induced changes in self-efficacy following a stress-management program were significantly related to other clinically important outcome measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smarr et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: