Key result
The Implanted Device Adjustment Scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90) and test-retest reliability (0.92) in patients with implanted cardiac devices.
Cross-Sectional (n=45)
The Implanted Device Adjustment Scale (IDAS) demonstrates high reliability and may be a useful tool to evaluate patient adjustment to implanted cardiac devices.
Supports IDAS reliability for device adjustment research; leaves open clinical adoption pending further validation.
Advances in microelectronics have resulted in exponential growth in the number of implanted medical devices. Most people do well adjusting to their devices, but others show signs of depression and/or anxiety. The Implanted Device Adjustment Scale (IDAS) was developed to measure how well a person is adjusting to an implanted device. First, a pool of items was generated and reviewed by 2 panels of clinicians and psychometricians for content validity. The revised version was then administered to a small sample that provided information about problematic items. Finally, a convenience sample of 45 persons (66% males) with implanted devices (18 pacemakers only, 37 cardioverter/defibrillators) completed the revised IDAS twice. After deleting weak items, the Cronbach alpha was 0.90. No age, gender, or device differences were found. Test-retest reliability was 0.92. The IDAS may be useful to evaluate how well a person is adjusting to her/his device. This may lead to more timely and appropriate interventions to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beery et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Implanted devices (n=45). Implanted Device Adjustment Scale (IDAS) was evaluated on Scale reliability (Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability). The Implanted Device Adjustment Scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90) and test-retest reliability (0.92) in patients with implanted cardiac devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: