Key result
Ultrasound screening in men aged 65-83 years showed AAA prevalence increased with age (P<0.001), and men of Mediterranean origin had a lower risk than Australian men (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.7).
RCT (n=12,203)
Randomized
Odds Ratio: 0.5 (95% CI 0.4–0.7)
Population-based ultrasound screening in older men demonstrates that AAA prevalence increases significantly with age and is less common in men of Mediterranean descent, supporting the definition of an aneurysm as an infra-renal aortic diameter of ≥30 mm.
Prevalence patterns by age and ethnicity may inform screening eligibility; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background. Increased life expectancy in men during the last thirty years is largely due to the decrease in mortality from cardiovascular disease in the age group 29–69 yr. This change has resulted in a change in the disease profile of the population with conditions such as aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) becoming more prevalent. The advent of endoluminal treatment for AAA has encouraged prophylactic intervention and fuelled the argument to screen for the disease. The feasibility of inserting an endoluminal graft is dependent on the morphology and growth characteristics of the aneurysm. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for AAA in men aged 65–83 yr in Western Australia for the purpose of determining the norms of the living anatomy in the pressurized infrarenal aorta. Aims. To examine (1) the diameters of the infra-renal aorta in aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal cases, (2) the implications for treatment modalities, with particular reference to endoluminal grafting, which is most dependent on normal and aneurysmal morphology, and (3) any evidence to support the notion that northern Europeans are predisposed to aneurysmal disease. Methods. Using ultrasound, a randomized control trial was established in Western Australia to assess the value of a screening program in males aged 65–83 yr. The infra-renal aorta was defined as aneurysmal if the maximum diameter was 30 mm or more. Aortic diameter was modelled both as a continuous (in mm) and as a binary outcome variable, for those men who had an infra-renal diameter of 30 mm or more. ANOVA and linear regression were used for modelling aortic diameter as a continuum, while chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used in comparing men with and without the diagnosis of AAA. Findings. By December 1998. of 19,583 men had been invited to undergo ultrasound screening for AAA, 12,203 accepted the invitation (corrected response fraction 70.8%). The prevalence of AAA increased with age from 4.8% at 65 yr to 10.8% at 80 yr (χ 2 = 77.9, df = 3, P<0.001). The median (IQR) diameter for the non-aneurysmal group was 21.4 mm (3.3 mm) and there was an increase (χ 2 = 76.0, df = 1. P<0.001) in the diameter of the infra-renal aorta with age. Since 27 mm is the 95th centile for the non-aneurysmal infra-renal aorta, a diameter of 30 mm or more is justified as defining an aneurysm. The risk of AAA was higher in men of Australian (OR = 1.0) and northern European origin (OR = 1.0, 95%CL: 0.9. 1.2) compared with those of Mediterranean origin (OR = 0.5, 95%CL: 0.4. 0.7). Conclusion. Although screening has not yet been shown to reduce mortality from AAA, these population-based data assist the understanding of aneurysmal disease and the further development and use of endoluminal grafts for this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence‐Brown et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) (n=12,203). Ultrasound screening was evaluated on Risk of AAA in men of Mediterranean origin compared to Australian origin (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.7). Ultrasound screening in men aged 65-83 years showed AAA prevalence increased with age (P<0.001), and men of Mediterranean origin had a lower risk than Australian men (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: