Key result
Selective screening of half the male population aged 65-83 years using risk factors would identify approximately 75% of abdominal aortic aneurysms, compared to 20% if screening only current smokers.
Why the study?
Does a selective screening strategy based on risk factors effectively identify abdominal aortic aneurysms in older men without missing clinically significant cases?
RCT (n=11,750)
Does a selective screening strategy based on risk factors effectively identify abdominal aortic aneurysms in older men without missing clinically significant cases?
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 20%
Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on risk factors is not worthwhile as it would miss approximately 25% of clinically significant cases compared to universal screening in this demographic.
Risk-based selective AAA screening should not yet replace universal programs in older men; leaves open whether refined models can safely improve efficiency.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) based on identification of a target group of manageable size defined by risk factors for AAA. SETTING: Male residents of Perth, Western Australia, aged 65-83 years, who participated in a randomised controlled trial of ultrasound screening for AAA. METHODS: Eligible men were identified from the electoral roll and invited to attend a screening clinic. Those who attended completed a questionnaire, had a limited physical examination, and underwent an ultrasound examination to identify the maximum diameter of the infrarenal aorta. Data on risk factors collected from the first 8995 men seen were used to calculate a multivariate risk score for the remaining 2755 men who were screened. Centiles of the risk score were used to define potential target groups for screening and the sensitivity and specificity of each of these selective screening strategies were calculated. We repeated the calculation separately for AAAs of at least 30 mm, 40 mm, and 50 mm in diameter. RESULTS: We found that screening half of the male population aged 65-83 years would find approximately 75% of AAAs, regardless of their size, whereas screening only current smokers in this population would find approximately 20% of AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: Selective screening for AAA using easily recognisable risk factors is feasible but is not worthwhile as approximately 25% ofclinically significant cases would be missed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spencer et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=11,750). Selective screening based on risk factors vs. Screening only current smokers was evaluated on Detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Selective screening of half the male population aged 65-83 years using risk factors would identify approximately 75% of abdominal aortic aneurysms, compared to 20% if screening only current smokers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: