Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis, characterization, and transformation of the anionic {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) [(NO)(2)Fe(ONO)(2)](-) (1), [(NO)(2)Fe(OPh)(2)](-) (2), [(NO)(2)Fe(OPh)(C(3)H(3)N(2))](-) (3) (C(3)H(3)N(2) = imidazolate), [(NO)(2)Fe(OPh)(-SC(4)H(3)S)](-) (4), [(NO)(2)Fe(p-OPhF)(2)](-) (5), and [(NO)(2)Fe(SPh)(ONO)](-) (6) were investigated. The binding affinity of ligands ([SPh](-), [-SC(4)H(3)S](-), [C(3)H(3)N(2)](-), [OPh](-), and [NO(2)](-)) toward the {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) motif follows the ligand-displacement series [SPh](-) approximately [-SC(4)H(3)S](-) > [C(3)H(3)N(2)](-) > [OPh](-) > [NO(2)](-). The findings, the pre-edge energy derived from the 1s --> 3d transition in a distorted T(d) environment of the Fe center falling within the range of 7113.4-7113.8 eV for the anionic {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) DNICs, implicate that the iron metal center of DNICs is tailored to minimize the electronic changes accompanying changes in coordinated ligands. Our results bridging the ligand-substitution reaction study and X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of the electronic richness of the {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) core may point the way to understanding the reasons for nature's choice of combinations of cysteine, histidine, and tyrosine in protein-bound DNICs and rationalize that most DNICs characterized/proposed nowadays are bound to the proteins almost through the thiolate groups of cysteinate/glutathione side chains in biological systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: