Key result
This review outlines open, endovascular, and hybrid repair options for aortic arch pathology, emphasizing the need for interventional wire skills for future aortic surgeons.
Why the study?
Aortic arch surgery has seen rapid evolution in techniques and devices, yet procedural strategies and the use of open, endovascular, or hybrid options vary substantially across countries, centres, and surgeons.
This review highlights the evolution of aortic arch surgery and advocates for the development of wire skills among aortic surgeons to facilitate hybrid and endovascular therapies.
Aortic arch pathology is relatively rare but potentially highly fatal and associated with considerable comorbidity. Operative mortality and complication rates have improved over time but remain high. In response, aortic arch surgery is one of the most rapidly evolving areas of cardiac surgery in terms of surgical volume and improved outcomes. Moreover, there has been a surge in novel devices and techniques, many of which have been developed by or codeveloped with vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Nevertheless, the extent of arch surgery, the choice of nadir temperature, cannulation, and perfusion strategies, and the use of open, endovascular, or hybrid options vary according to country, centre, and surgeon. In this review article, we provide a technical overview of the surgical, total endovascular, and hybrid repair options for aortic arch pathology through historical developments and contemporary results. We highlight key information for surgeons, cardiologists, and trainees to understand the management of patients with aortic arch pathology. We conclude by discussing training paradigms, the role of aortic teams, and gaps in knowledge, arguing for the need for wire skills for the future "interventional aortic surgeon" and increased research into techniques and novel devices to continue improving outcomes for aortic arch surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vervoort et al. (2023) conducted a review in Aortic arch pathology. Open, endovascular, and hybrid therapies was evaluated. This review outlines open, endovascular, and hybrid repair options for aortic arch pathology, emphasizing the need for interventional wire skills for future aortic surgeons.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: