Comparative validation study reveals automated deep-learning radiation planning matches manual quality in prostate and breast cancers, indicating potential to streamline clinical workflows.
Purpose Inverse treatment planning (ITP) in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) involves the specification of dose constraints as objective functions. These are manually and iteratively adjusted during planning to achieve patient-specific optimal outcomes. We propose a knowledge-based treatment planning (KBP) solution using deep learning to automate ITP. Methods KBP is tested for prostate and breast volumetric modulated arc therapy. A 2.5D-U-Net is optimized for dose prediction using 72/66 treatment plans obtained from manual planning (MP). The dose prediction model is then used to derive personalized optimization parameters to control ITP for 12 test patient datasets each ( 60 / 50 G y prescription dose). For inference, MP and KBP outcomes are compared using DVH metrics, plan quality metric ( PQM ) and blinded expert rating. Results Median differences ( MD ) between MP and KBP are maximum 0.5 G y in absolute values for prostate organs at risk (OAR) mean doses. MD in V 56 G y is 0.4 c c for rectum and bladder. For breast treatment, absolute MD values for OAR mean doses are maximum 0.4 G y . MD in V 20 G y of the ipsilateral lung is - 1.0 % . MD in PQM is 0.2 % and 2.9 % for prostate and breast, respectively. According to expert rating, in none of the test cases KBP provides a markedly worse plan than MP. Conclusion We developed a KBP solution for ITP of IMRT that is able to automatically generate treatment plans with similar quality when compared to MP. This has the potential to facilitate and accelerate ITP while ensuring high treatment plan quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oppitz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: