Key result
VWF activity assays showed significant interassay variability in proficiency testing, with VWF:RCo demonstrating greater imprecision than newer GPIb-binding assays.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend newer VWF platelet-binding assays over VWF:RCo, but lack of FDA clearance limits their US availability, prompting an evaluation of assay utilization, agreement, and imprecision.
Observational
Yes
The analysis confirms that newer VWF activity assays have less imprecision than the traditional VWF:RCo assay, supporting guideline recommendations despite regulatory barriers to their use in the US.
Guidelines recommend newer GPIb-based assays over VWF:RCo for VWD diagnosis; leaves open optimal choice across subtypes.
Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salazar et al. (2022) conducted an observational in von Willebrand disease. Newer VWF platelet-binding activity assays (VWF:GPIbM, VWF:GPIbR) vs. VWF:RCo assay was evaluated on Assay utilization trends, agreement of testing methods, and imprecision of testing. VWF activity assays showed significant interassay variability in proficiency testing, with VWF:RCo demonstrating greater imprecision than newer GPIb-binding assays.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: