Key result
Carotid imaging has no current role in patients without a history of carotid-territory stroke or transient ischemic attack, as invasive procedures cannot be justified.
Why the study?
Does carotid imaging improve outcomes or risk stratification in asymptomatic patients?
Does carotid imaging improve outcomes or risk stratification in asymptomatic patients?
Routine carotid imaging is not justified in asymptomatic patients due to low contemporary stroke rates with medical management and lack of evidence for improved risk stratification.
Cautions against routine carotid imaging in asymptomatic patients; leaves open whether refined selection could identify benefit in future studies.
Carotid ultrasonography is performed frequently to identify carotid stenosis in patients with no history of carotid-territory cerebrovascular ischemia. The premises of such testing are that the potential benefit of endarterectomy or stenting exceeds the potential harm in patients with asymptomatic stenosis and that discovery of asymptomatic stenosis may trigger beneficial changes in lifestyle or medical management that otherwise would not have occurred. However, given low contemporary rates of stroke in medically managed patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, invasive carotid procedures cannot be justified in this population. Moreover, among patients at increased cardiovascular risk, there is no evidence that carotid imaging motivates behavioral change or improves risk stratification beyond consideration of conventional risk factors. In this focused review, we address topics that should help health care professionals advise patients who inquire about carotid screening and patients in whom asymptomatic carotid stenosis has already been identified. We conclude that there is currently no role for carotid imaging in patients without a history of carotid-territory stroke or transient ischemic attack.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brett et al. (2014) conducted a review in Asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid ultrasonography was evaluated. Carotid imaging has no current role in patients without a history of carotid-territory stroke or transient ischemic attack, as invasive procedures cannot be justified.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: