Key result
Modified TAPSE (m-TAPSE) correlated with both TAPSE and RV fractional area change, demonstrating its utility as an alternative parameter for evaluating right ventricular systolic function.
Why the study?
TAPSE measurement via transesophageal echocardiography is limited by alignment with the RV lateral wall, prompting the development of modified TAPSE as a novel alternative.
Does m-TAPSE accurately assess right ventricular systolic function compared to TAPSE and RV FAC in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Observational (n=125)
No
Does m-TAPSE accurately assess right ventricular systolic function compared to TAPSE and RV FAC in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
m-TAPSE is a simple, reliable, and easily reproducible transesophageal echocardiography parameter that correlates well with TAPSE and RV FAC for intraoperative assessment of right ventricular systolic function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
m-TAPSE may aid RV assessment during TEE; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) has become a popular tool for assessing right ventricular (RV) systolic function because of its ease of application. TAPSE using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is limited by alignment with the lateral wall of the RV. Modified TAPSE (m-TAPSE) is a novel method for measuring TAPSE. m-TAPSE is the difference in the 'apical to lateral tricuspid annulus distance' during diastole and systole. The aim of the present study was to compare prospectively m-TAPSE with the most commonly used parameter TAPSE and near-gold standard 2D echocardiographic parameter RV fractional area change (RV FAC). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 125 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a single tertiary care center. Post-anesthetic induction TAPSE was recorded using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). m-TAPSE was recorded using TEE in the mid-esophageal four-chamber view. RV FAC was also assessed using TEE. m-TAPSE < 16 mm, TAPSE < 16 mm and RV FAC < 35% were taken as cut-offs for RV systolic dysfunction. Correlations were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using 2 × 2 cross table. RESULTS: m-TAPSE was significantly correlated with TAPSE (r = 0.797, p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant correlation was observed between m-TAPSE and RV FAC (r = 0.602, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of m-TAPSE were 100%, 98.3%, 80%, 100% and 98.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: m-TAPSE correlated well with both RV FAC and TAPSE. Therefore, m-TAPSE can be considered an easily measurable alternative parameter for evaluating RV systolic function in a busy intraoperative setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhawan et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n=125). Modified Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (m-TAPSE) vs. TAPSE and RV Fractional Area Change (RV FAC) was evaluated on Correlation of m-TAPSE with TAPSE and RV FAC (r = 0.797, p=<0.001). Modified TAPSE (m-TAPSE) correlated with both TAPSE and RV fractional area change, demonstrating its utility as an alternative parameter for evaluating right ventricular systolic function.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: