Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Changes in extracellular K+ concentration [( K+]o) were measured with ion-selective microelectrodes in chronic epileptic foci induced by topical application of A1(OH)3 cream on the sensorimotor cortex of cats. The foci were morphologically characterized by a scar surrounded by an area of marked gliosis. Base-line levels of [K+]o in gliotic tissue and its immediate border zone were comparable to those in normal cortical tissue. Peak levels of [K+]o obtained during repetitive electrical stimulation of the cortical surface and thalamic ventrobasal complex were only slightly enhanced with 11.6 mM in chronic foci and 10.8 mM in normal cortex. Iontophoretic K+ application into gliotic tissue was accompanied by slow negative potential shifts comparable to those observed in normal cortex. Passage of constant current through gliotic tissue caused local [K+]o changes in the vicinity of the current-passing electrode. Since these [K+]o changes were similar to those observed in normal tissue, it was concluded that the amount of transcellularly transported K ions was comparable in both tissues. Changes in the size of extracellular space (ES) were investigated by measuring local concentration changes of iontophoretically injected tetramethylammonium and choline ions. During stimulus-induced seizure activity, the ES shrank outside the gliotic area at sites of maximal [K+]o elevation, while it increased at sites within the gliotic tissue where [K+]o rises were smaller. The results suggest that the spatial buffer capacity of gliotic tissue for K+ is not severely impaired. Since the relationship between rises in [K+]o and subsequent undershoots at sites immediately bordering the gliotic tissue is comparable to that in normal cortex, the ability of this epileptic tissue for active K+ uptake appears to be unaffected. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that iontophoretically induced rises in [K+]o during undershoots are reduced to a similar extent as in normal cortex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heinemann et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: