Key result
A nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention was feasible and acceptable for women with acute coronary syndrome, increasing mean knowledge scores by 7.4%.
Why the study?
Symptom type influences recognition in women with ACS, with less intense or intermittent symptoms leading to poorer attribution and care-seeking delays, motivating an intervention to improve recognition and interpretation.
Does a nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention improve symptom recognition and interpretation in women with acute coronary syndrome?
Does a nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention improve symptom recognition and interpretation in women with acute coronary syndrome?
A nurse-delivered educational intervention is feasible and acceptable for improving symptom recognition and interpretation in women with ACS.
Supports feasibility of nurse-delivered ACS education; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
BACKGROUND: The type of symptoms that a woman experiences during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event influences symptom recognition and interpretation. Women who experience intense, abrupt symptoms are more likely to correctly attribute symptoms to a cardiac etiology and seek care faster than women with less intense, intermittent symptoms. OBJECTIVE: A single-group pretest-posttest design was used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention designed to improve symptom recognition and interpretation in women with recurrent ACS symptoms. METHODS: Women hospitalized for an ACS event received an individualized education and skill-building intervention that was conceptually framed by the investigator's previous research. Three in-person sessions were followed by 2 telephone sessions for reinforcement. Outcomes and acceptability were evaluated at close-out (approximately 2 months after the index event). RESULTS: All but 2 women approached agreed to participate. Of the 10 women enrolled, 9 completed all study sessions within an average of 55 days. Mean knowledge scores increased by 7.4% measured by the ACS Response Index. Attitudes toward symptom recognition and help seeking increased by 2.4, whereas beliefs toward expectations and actions increased by 3.2. The women were pleased with the intervention (satisfaction scores averaging 1.4 on a 4-point Likert scale, with 1 as "strongly agree" and 4 as "strongly disagree"). All women who completed the study would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: The nurse-delivered intervention was feasible and acceptable to women in the study. Results support further testing and refinement of the intervention in a longitudinal randomized control study to determine efficacy and sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2018) studied Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=10). Nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention was evaluated on Feasibility, acceptability, and changes in knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. A nurse-delivered education and skill-building intervention was feasible and acceptable for women with acute coronary syndrome, increasing mean knowledge scores by 7.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: