Key result
A Support Vector Regression model using only 3 statistical features from Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signals accurately estimated continuous pain intensity with a mean absolute error of 0.93.
Why the study?
Subjective self-reported pain assessment in current clinical settings causes suboptimal treatment, over-prescription of opioids, and drug-seeking behavior.
Can machine learning models using physiological sensor data accurately estimate continuous pain intensity?
Can machine learning models using physiological sensor data accurately estimate continuous pain intensity?
Machine learning models using just 3 statistical features from electrodermal activity signals can accurately estimate pain intensity, paving the way for wearable objective pain measurement devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simple EDA-ML models may enable objective pain assessment; leaves open prospective validation in clinical populations before practice change.
In current clinical settings, typically pain is measured by a patient's self-reported information. This subjective pain assessment results in suboptimal treatment plans, over-prescription of opioids, and drug-seeking behavior among patients. In the present study, we explored automatic objective pain intensity estimation machine learning models using inputs from physiological sensors. This study uses BioVid Heat Pain Dataset. We extracted features from Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electromyogram (EMG) signals collected from study participants subjected to heat pain. We built different machine learning models, including Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Neural Networks and Extreme Gradient Boosting for continuous value pain intensity estimation. Then we identified the physiological sensor, feature set and machine learning model that give the best predictive performance. We found that EDA is the most information-rich sensor for continuous pain intensity prediction. A set of only 3 features from EDA signals using SVR model gave an average performance of 0.93 mean absolute error (MAE) and 1.16 root means square error (RMSE) for the subject-independent model and of 0.92 MAE and 1.13 RMSE for subject-dependent. The MAE achieved with signal-feature-model combination is less than 1 unit on 0 to 4 continues pain scale, which is smaller than the MAE achieved by the methods reported in the literature. These results demonstrate that it is possible to estimate pain intensity of a patient using a computationally inexpensive machine learning model with 3 statistical features from EDA signal which can be collected from a wrist biosensor. This method paves a way to developing a wearable pain measurement device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pouromran et al. (2021) studied Pain (n=87). Support Vector Regression using 3 features from Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signals vs. Other physiological sensors (ECG, EMG) and machine learning models was evaluated on Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for continuous pain intensity estimation on a 0-4 scale (MAE 0.93, p=<0.01). A Support Vector Regression model using only 3 statistical features from Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signals accurately estimated continuous pain intensity with a mean absolute error of 0.93.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: