Key result
Electrodermal activity (EDA) sensing was the most informative physiological measure, achieving 93.2% accuracy in identifying acute pain.
Why the study?
Patients unable to self-report pain are at higher risk of undiagnosed pain, prompting the exploration of multimodal physiological sensing as a proxy for objective acute pain measurement.
Does multimodal physiological sensing (EDA, PPG, RESP) improve the objective identification of acute pain in healthy participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=22)
No
Does multimodal physiological sensing (EDA, PPG, RESP) improve the objective identification of acute pain in healthy participants?
Electrodermal activity (EDA) combined with machine learning models provides a highly accurate objective measure for identifying the presence and intensity of acute pain in an experimental setting.
Pain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of multiple sensing technologies to monitor physiological changes that can be used as a proxy for objective measurement of acute pain. Electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiration (RESP) signals were collected from 22 participants under two pain intensities (low and high) and on two different anatomical locations (forearm and hand). Three machine learning models were implemented, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the identification of pain. Various pain scenarios were investigated, identification of pain (no pain, pain), multiclass (no pain, low pain, high pain), and identification of pain location (forearm, hand). Reference classification results from individual sensors and from all sensors together were obtained. After feature selection, results showed that EDA was the most informative sensor in the three pain conditions, 93.2 ± 8 % in identification of pain, 68.9 ± 10 % in the multiclass problem, and 56.0 ± 8 % for the identification of pain location. These results identify EDA as the superior sensor in our experimental conditions. Future work is required to validate the obtained features to improve its feasibility in more realistic scenarios. Finally, this study proposes EDA as a candidate to design a tool that can assist clinicians in the assessment of acute pain of nonverbal patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rojas et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute pain (n=22). Electrodermal activity (EDA) sensing vs. Photoplethysmography (PPG) and respiration (RESP) sensing was evaluated on Identification of pain (no pain vs pain). Electrodermal activity (EDA) sensing was the most informative physiological measure, achieving 93.2% accuracy in identifying acute pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: