Key result
Compared with glatiramer acetate, delayed-release dimethyl fumarate yielded 0.528 incremental QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD $44,118/QALY.
Why the study?
Is delayed-release dimethyl fumarate cost-effective compared to other disease-modifying therapies for first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada?
Is delayed-release dimethyl fumarate cost-effective compared to other disease-modifying therapies for first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada?
Effect estimate: ICER CAD $44,118/QALY vs glatiramer acetate
Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate is a cost-effective first-line treatment option for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada compared to other disease-modifying therapies.
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes significant disability and diminished quality-of-life. Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) is a new oral treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) approved in the US, Australia, Canada, and Europe. OBJECTIVES: A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare the health economic impact of DMF against other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) as first-line RRMS treatment from a Canadian Ministry of Health perspective. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients' progression through health states based on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) over a life-time horizon. Patients entered the model based on a distribution of baseline EDSS scores, from which they could progress to higher or regress to lower EDSS state, or remain in the same state. Relapses could occur at any EDSS score. Results from a mixed-treatment comparison were used to inform model inputs for disease progression and relapse rates per treatment. Costs included direct medical costs stratified by EDSS score. Utilities were accrued based on time spent in each EDSS state. RESULTS: Compared with glatiramer acetate, DMF yielded 0.528 incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $23 338 Canadian dollars (CAD), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD $44 118/QALY. The ICER for DMF compared with Rebif 44 mcg was CAD $10 672. Results were consistent across a wide range of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Based on traditional cost-effectiveness thresholds in Canada (CAD $50 000-60 000), DMF can be considered a cost-effective option compared to other first-line DMTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2016) studied Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs. Other disease-modifying therapies (e.g., glatiramer acetate, Rebif 44 mcg) was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (ICER CAD $44,118/QALY vs glatiramer acetate). Compared with glatiramer acetate, delayed-release dimethyl fumarate yielded 0.528 incremental QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD $44,118/QALY.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: