Key result
A collaborative partnership between hospice and cardiology services enables patients with end-stage heart failure to return home with hospice while continuing inotropic therapy.
Why the study?
Patients with end-stage heart failure seeking comfort-based care while continuing inotropic therapy face challenges finding hospice agencies willing to integrate this treatment.
Collaborative partnerships between hospice and cardiology can overcome barriers to admitting ESHF patients receiving inotropic therapy, allowing them to return home for comfort-based care.
Single-agency experience suggests feasibility of inotropic integration in hospice; leaves open broader evaluation before practice change.
As treatments for end-stage heart failure (ESHF) have become more available, patients with ESHF may encounter decisional dilemmas as their condition progresses and they seek more comfort-based care. Those who want to continue therapeutic treatments such as inotropic therapy, may face the challenge of finding a hospice agency willing to integrate this therapy into the hospice benefit model. This article highlights one hospice agency's willingness to explore common barriers to admitting patients receiving inotropic therapy, and addresses the trajectory of patient care when hospice collaboratively partners with cardiology services. It outlines operational development for providing cardiac focused care in hospice, and speaks to next steps for expanding these services. Most importantly, it acknowledges the profound effect on patients who are offered the choice to return home with hospice while receiving cardiac therapeutic care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2023) studied End-stage heart failure. Collaborative cardiac hospice care integrating inotropic therapy was evaluated. A collaborative partnership between hospice and cardiology services enables patients with end-stage heart failure to return home with hospice while continuing inotropic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: