Key result
Regional anesthesia with propofol sedation resulted in higher cognitive function scores at 4 weeks compared to general combined anesthesia (30 vs. 28, p=0.010).
Why the study?
General anesthesia may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in patients with severe concomitant trauma undergoing multiple surgical interventions, but the influence of the anesthetic method remains unclear.
Does regional anesthesia with propofol sedation improve postoperative cognitive function compared to general combined anesthesia in patients with severe concomitant trauma?
Does regional anesthesia with propofol sedation improve postoperative cognitive function compared to general combined anesthesia in patients with severe concomitant trauma?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.010
Regional anesthesia with propofol sedation may be associated with better cognitive and psychoemotional recovery than general anesthesia in severe trauma patients undergoing multiple surgeries.
Anesthetic choice may influence cognitive outcomes after repeated trauma surgery; leaves open optimal method pending higher-level evidence.
Background. Treatment of patients with severe concomitant trauma often requires multiple surgical interventions. General anesthesia can contribute to cognitive dysfunction. Thus, possible development and course of postoperative cognitive impairment will depend on the method and amount of anesthesia. This is especially true for multiple procedures within a short period. Objective. To study the effect of various anesthetic methods on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression and psycho-emotional changes in patients with severe concomitant trauma undergoing multiple surgical interventions. Material and methods. A pilot study included 23 victims with severe concomitant trauma: group 1 — general combined anesthesia, group 2 — regional anesthesia with propofol sedation. Results. In 4 weeks after multiple interventions, cognitive function was higher in the 2nd group (28 (28; 28) vs. 30 (29; 30) scores, respectively, p=0.010). Mental activation level increased at the 3rd stage of the study in the second group (11 (10; 12) vs. 7 (5; 8) points, p=0.0008). The level of interest increased between stages 2 and 3 and reached a maximum by the 4th week in the 2nd group (8 (6; 10) and 5 (4; 6) points, p=0.010). Conclusion. Regional anesthesia with propofol sedation is associated with earlier recovery of cognitive function and better indices of psychoemotional components after multiple interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Щеголев et al. (2023) studied Severe concomitant trauma (n=23). Regional anesthesia with propofol sedation vs. General combined anesthesia was evaluated on Cognitive function score at 4 weeks (p=0.010). Regional anesthesia with propofol sedation resulted in higher cognitive function scores at 4 weeks compared to general combined anesthesia (30 vs. 28, p=0.010).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: