Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wild herring larvae were sampled from the Firth of Clyde, Scotland in 1980 and 1981 to assess the suitability of otolith ageing methods for herring larval studies. The ages and growth rates were estimated directly from otolith ring counts, by comparison of ring counts with the results of validation studies on reared larvae of known age, and by back‐calculation. Growth rates based on otolith data were compared with indirect calculations based on length at capture. The assumption of daily ring deposition, even allowing for a period of lag before the initiation of daily ring deposition, led to incorrect predictions for age at yolk‐sac absorption, and back‐calculations led to overestimated growth rates, indicating that ring deposition does not begin at hatching and that light microscope counts give a rate different from one ring per day in wild herring larvae.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audrey J. Geffen (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: