Key result
taVNS safely modulates autonomic and cortical activity, but optimal stimulation parameters remain unclear.
Why the study?
Variability in stimulation parameters and inconsistent effects of taVNS remain significant issues despite existing safety and efficacy reviews.
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) demonstrate safety and efficacy in healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease?
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) demonstrate safety and efficacy in healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease?
taVNS appears safe and capable of modulating autonomic and cortical activity, but further standardization of stimulation parameters is needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
taVNS safety supports expanded research; leaves open parameter standardization and efficacy confirmation in stroke/Parkinson's.
Among the noninvasive electrical stimulation methods, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) regulates the activity of various neural networks in the brain and autonomic nervous system and is expected to be applied clinically in many areas, including in patients with central nervous system, psychiatric, and cardiac diseases. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on safety and efficacy, the variability of stimulation parameters and the lack of consistency in their effects remain significant issues. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide a comprehensive view of the safety, parameters, and efficacy of taVNS by focusing on studies in healthy participants, patients with stroke, and patients with Parkinson's disease. A literature search was conducted from October 14 to 25 November 2024, using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The following search terms were used: "noninvasive VNS or nVNS or noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation," "transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation or tVNS," and "transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation or taVNS." In total, 154 papers were included, of which 139 were on healthy participants, nine on patients with stroke, and six on patients with Parkinson's disease. The safety of taVNS was relatively high. Although minor side effects were reported, no serious adverse events were attributed to taVNS parameters used. taVNS could regulate brain activity, motor and mental functions, and autonomic nervous system activity in patients with stroke and Parkinson's disease. Modulation of the autonomic nervous system and cortical excitability was also observed in healthy individuals. However, these effects may depend on the stimulation parameters. The lack of reports on safety and the stimulation parameters used was also highlighted. Further validation of parameters and accumulation of evidence regarding the efficacy of taVNS are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2025) conducted a review in Healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease (n=6,485). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) vs. Sham or control was evaluated on Safety, stimulation parameters, and efficacy. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is generally safe and modulates autonomic and cortical activity in healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease, though optimal parameters remain unclear.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: