Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the paper "Retrofocusing technique for high rate acoustic communications" [M. Stojanovic, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1173-1185 (2005)], it is suggested that the time reversal approach requires a large number of array elements to compete with other approaches. Here the analysis of that paper is extended with a modified example to compare the performance of various approaches in three respects: (1) array element distribution across the water column, (2) channel normalization, and (3) phase delay across the array. In contrast, our results show that the time reversal approach combined with channel equalization can offer nearly optimal performance with a very small four element array.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: